Pearson v. United States, 544 U.S. 1034 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Pearson v. United States, 544 U.S. 1034 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kokoska v. Joe Tahan's Furniture Liquidation Ctrs., Inc. (nyappdiv, 2025-07-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Kokoska v. Joe Tahan's Furniture Liquidation Ctrs., Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
"An 'employee employed in a bona fide administrative capacity' is defined as an employee earning not less than [a certain level][ [FN3] ] per week, '[w]hose primary duty is the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer's customers,' and who exercises discretion and independent judgment in performing his or her duties" ( Lichtman v Martin's News Shops Mgt., Inc. , 81 AD3d 696, 698 [2d Dept 2011], quoting 29 CFR 541.200 [a] [2]; see Matter of Conners [Commissioner of Labor] , 9 AD3d 703 , 705 [3d Dep…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Garcia
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
(See People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109 [2003]; People v McKenzie, 4 AD3d 437 [2d Dept 2004]; see also United States v Couto, 311 F3d 179 [2d Cir 2002], appeal after remand 119 Fed Appx 345 [2005], cert denied 544 US 1034 [2005], abrogated by Padilla.) This landscape was altered on March 31, 2010 when the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. Smith
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mollinger-Wilson v. Quizno’s Franchise Co., 122 Fed.Appx. 917, 923 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1034 , 125 S.Ct. 2272 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1061 (2005) (“The Colorado courts have stated that 'one dollar is nominal damages' ") (citation omitted); Mayberry v. Robinson, 427 F.Supp. 297, 314 (M.D.Pa.1977) ("The rule of law in the Third Circuit is that nominal damages may not exceed $1.00''); Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C., 526 N.W.2d 704, 709 (N.D.1995) (under North Dakota law, "[njominal damages are limited to one dollar”); Fla. Dep't of Corrections v. Niosi, 583 So.2d 441 …
Pearson
v.
United States
04-1337.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 2005.
544 U.S. 1034
Published

544 U.S. 1034

PEARSON
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 04-1337.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 16, 2005.

1

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.