green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
“ersons have a legitimate expectation of privacy in their purses and other closed containers that normally hold highly personal items.”
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Roy Huddleston v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
ersons have a legitimate expectation of privacy in their purses and other closed containers that normally hold highly personal items.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Buie
See State v. McCaughey, 127 Idaho 669, 673-74 , 904 P.2d 939 (1995); Lee v. State, 849 N.E.2d 602, 610 (Ind. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1211 , 127 S. *800 Ct. 1331, 167 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Musick
(2×)
See United States v. Blackwell, 459 F.3d 739, 766-67 (6th Cir.2006), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 1336 , 167 L.Ed.2d 84 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manns
See United States v. Blackwell, 459 F.3d 739, 768 (6th Cir.2006), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 1336 , 167 L.Ed.2d 84 (2007); Copeland, 321 F.3d at 597 ; United States v. Fortson, 194 F.3d 730, 737 (6th Cir.1999); United States v. Maddox, 944 F.2d 1223, 1230 (6th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 961 , 112 S.Ct. 2317 , 119 L.Ed.2d 236 (1992).
MTA NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, petitioner,
v.
John REITER.
v.
John REITER.
06-890.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 2007.
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Indiana Court of Appeals (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.