Dandar v. Krysevig, 176 L. Ed. 2d 177 (SCOTUS 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Dandar v. Krysevig, 176 L. Ed. 2d 177 (SCOTUS 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Cleto Tarin (ca5, 2017-12-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Cleto Tarin
5th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
He offers nothing that supports the conclusion that the determination that drug dealing was a principal use of a certain premises is implausible “in light of the record as a whole” or creates “the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Ekanem, 555 F.3d 172, 175 (5th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see United States v. Benitez, 809 F.3d 243, 250 (5th Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1694 (2016).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harris
2d Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Jackson, 347 Fed.Appx. 701, 703 (2d Cir. 2009) (reasoning that “reliability of both victims’ hearsay accounts ... was so convincingly demonstrated as to preclude a finding of abuse in the decision to admit their statements” despite lack of domestic violence history and one victim’s recanta *109 tion), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 968 , 130 S.Ct. 1544 , 176 L.Ed.2d 152 (2010).
Ronald G. Dandar
v.
Mark Krysevig
No. 09-8158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 177
Published

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.