MATTER 05 M D---- S---- & W D C

In EXCLUSION Proceedings

A-11135619 A-11132260 A-10367389

Dooidod by Ronod December 12, 1958

Resident alien—"Commuter"—Commuter status lost when alien has been out of employment for 6 months regardless of validity of Form 1-151 as reentry document. Regulation authorizing use of Form I-151 as reentry document for resident alien who has been absent from United States for period not exceeding one Your dnos not cause any change in long-standing rule relating to commuters. Loss of commuter status occurs, as before, whelk Ole alien ban boon out of employment in the United States for more than 6 months. (Cf. Matter of L , 4 L & N. Dec. 454, and Matter of 5 I. & N. Dec. 716.)

EXCLUDABLE Act of 1252—Section 512(0) (go) to UX.C. 1102(o) (`_>n)) —No visa, no passport.

BEFORE THE BOARD

Discussion: The cases come forward on appeal from the Dis- trict Directors at Detroit, Michigan, and at Buffalo, New York, from &ski.ns rendered by two special inquiry officers on Septem- ber 12, 1958, September 29, 1958, and October 6, 1958, directing that the applicants be admitted as Canadian resident commuters. The cases have been combined inasmuch as they involve a common set of facts and point of law. The first case involves a native and national of Canada, 51 years old, widow, female, who was admitted to the United States fox permanent rgidence at Detroit, Michigan, on November 26, 1957, upon presentation of a nonquota, immigrant visa. Her status was adjusted on the date of her admission to that of the Canadian resi- dent commute: and oho has always maintained her residence in Riverside, Ontario, Canada. She commuted daily to Detroit, Michi- gan, where she was employed as a saleswoman by a jewelry firm until December 10, 1957, but has not been employed since that date. She testified that she stopped working on December 10, 1957, in order to be with her husband, then seriously ill, who passed away a few days later. She then lost the services of her housekeeper upon whom she depended to look after her child while she was employed in Detroit and was not able to find another satisfactory housekeeper until a month before her application for admission. For this reason she was unable to seek and procure reemployment in the United States but she now has been offered employment by her former com- pany or another prospective employer, both of whom have solicited her services. She claims that she has not abandoned her commuter etatuo and that oho is still entitled to the privilegoo recerved for a returning resident alien. She is in possession of a "temporary" Alien Registration Receipt Card which she used as a border-crossing identification card while commuting to work. She apparently had been issued this card when admitted for permanent residence and one of the conditions specified on the card limited its use to return- ing after absences not exceeding 6 months. Another Alien Registra- tion Receipt Card was mailed to her at her Canadian address on December 8, 1957, but she has no knowledge of receiving this card. The second case concerns a native and national of Canada, 26 years uld, married, male, who was admitted to the United Slates fur permanent residence on November 18, 1957, upon presentation of a nonquota immigrant visa. His status was adjusted immediately after admission to that of a Canadian resident commuter upon a showing that he was returning to his residence. in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, and was destined to employment as a salesman for a de- partment store in Detroit, Michigan. He was laid off on December 28, 1957, and since that date has made constant and almost continu- ous efforts to find other employment in the United States without success. This appears to have been due to the widespread unem- ployment in Detroit since the spring of 1555. In the meantime he did odd jobs in Canada and availed himself of unemployment bene- fits to support his family. He has found that an opening may be available again with his former employer in the United States and seeks to reenter as a commuter despite the fact that he has not been employed for almost 9 months. He is in possession of an Alien Reg- istration Receipt Card, Form 1- 151 (edition of September 11, 1956), which serves as a border-crossing identification card. The third case relates to a, native and national of Cainada, 21 years old, married, male, who was admitted to the United States on Sep- tember 10, 1957, as a nonquota immigrant. He retained residence in Canada and was employed in Buffalo, New York, from October 12, 1957, until March 14, 1958, as a production man for General Motors. At the time of his employment he obtained a Form 1-151, Alien Registration Receipt Card, which serves as a resident alien's border-crossing card. During his employment he was recognised as a commuter. However, he was laid off on March 14, 1958, be- cause of lack of work and has sought employment in the United States on various occasions since then without success. He now desires to seek work in the United States. He testified that about months prior to his application for admission he desired to move to this country from Canada but his wife was then pregnant and was unable to move. Since that time she has had a child. The applicant intends to establish actual residence in this country within a short time and intends to have his wife and child join him as soon as they are able to do so. The three cases have a common set of facts. In each case the alien was admitted for permanent residence upon presentation of a non- quota immigrant visa, their status was immediately adjusted to that of a commuter, they were employed in the United States while re- siding in Canada, and in each ease the alien has been out of work for more than 6 months. It appears to be the Service contention that the so-called commuter category is available only if the person has not been unemployed in the United States for 6 months and that beyond that period they are no longer eligible for the commuter classification or for treatment as returning resident aliens. The special inquiry officer, however, has equated the status of the aliens with that of permanent resident aliens and in view of the eatension of the period of validity of the Form I-151 to a period of one year, has concluded that the aliens are eligible to return in possession of Forms 1- 151 as returning residents. The applicants belong to a class known as commuters, namely; aliens who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence but con- tinue to retain their place of residence in foreign contiguous terri- tory while commuting to their place of employment in this country. This anomalous class of immigrants known as "commuter" is fully treated in Matter of L—, 4 I. & N. Dec. 454. After the enactment of the Immigration and Nationality Act, since that act was silent with regard to commuters, it was again necessary to consider the question and it was decided in Matter of 5 I. & N. Dec. 716, that this long-standing practice had not been disturbed by the enactment of the new act. In numerous cities along the international boundary lines to the north and to the south of the United States live many aliens who each day journey to their jobs on the American side of the border and at the end of the same day usually return to their homes on the other side of the frontier. At the same time there exists a somewhat smaller daily movement of Americans to and from jobs in Canada and Mexico. This flow of aliens across the frontier posed no administrative difficulty until the passage of the Immigration Act of 1924 which laid down universal rules for documentation and classified all arriving aliens as immigrants unless they fell into certain designated groups described as nonimmigrants. Until April 1, 1927, they were permitted to enter as border crossers without having been admitted for permanent residence. However, on that date the policy was changed by the issuance of General Order No. 86, which provided that such aliens entering the United States subsequent to June 30, 1924, to engage in employment or to seek employment would not be considered as visitors for business or pleasure but as aliens of the immigrant class and granted them a reasonable period of time not to exceed 0 inUtial, from June 1, 1917, within which to obtain immigration visas if they had been enjoying the border-crossing privilege on April 1, 1927. The legality of General Order Nn CO was sustained in the ease of Yamuth v Umitpd States en rel. Albro, 279 U.S. 231 (1929). Although General Order No. 86 was later cancelled, the rights accrued thereunder were not cancelled and subsequent regulations provided that alien commuters should be considered aliens of the immigrant class (former 8 CFR 110.6, previously paragraph 1, subdivision C of Rule 3, Immigration Laws and Rules of January 1, 1930). The adoption of the policy found in General Order islo. 86 aroused controversy and appre- hension along the Canadian and Mexican borders and fears that the means of livelihood of the commuter would be jeopardized if access to their jobs were shut. Representations on high diplomatic levels were made and out of these discussions there eventually emerged an amplification of our policy which permitted alien commuters to establish lawful admission into the United States for permanent residence, then furnished them with border-crossing identification cards and permitted them to cross international boundary en route to and from their employment (former 8 CFR 166). A memoran- dum from the Commissioner General (File 55499/537—A, November 16, 1927), in answer to questions raised by General Order No. 86, set forth the policy that an alien residing in foreign contiguous territory and enjoying the border-crossing privilege abandons such right when he discontinues his employment in the United States and does not renew same within a period of 6 months. Thus, it has been held that an alien of the immigrant commuter class who has been out of employment in the United States for 6 months is, notwithstanding temporary entries in the meanwhile for other than employment purposes, deemed to have abandoned his status of a permanent resident in the United States and thereafter, if he seeks to reenter, is not admissible without again qualifying for admission as a permanent resident (Matter of L , 4 I. & N. Dec. 456). The salient points to be considered in determining aban- donment of commuter status are intention and loss of employment. It has been held that a commuter remains entitled to such classifica- tion, notwithstanding an absence of 6 months from this country and interruption of his work for that period, if his employment, job or position has not been lost and if the interruption was due to uncon- trollable circumstances, such as serious illness, pregnancy, or a dis- abling injury, such as a broken arm, in which case the 6-month period tolls until the commuter is again employable.' A commuter who has been legally admitted as an immigrant is entitled to receive a border-crossing identification card so long as he continues in the status of a commuter (Matter of 5 I. & N. Dec. 718). The commuter situation manifestly does not fit into any precise category found in the immigration statutes. The status is an artificial one, predicated upon good international rela - tions maintained and cherished between friendly neighbors. As examples of the anomalous situation of the commuter, he cannot claim naturalization benefits since the naturalization statute by definition equates residence with domicile rather than an assimilated status (Petition of Wright, 42 Supp. 306; In re Barron, 26 F.2d 106 (1928); Petition of Correa, 79 F. Supp. 265 (1948)). It has also been held that a commuter is not a resident of the United States under the Selective Service regulations (32 CFR 611.13(a) (6), 611.13 (b) (7), (1944)), because he did not reside in the United States for the required period of 3 months. On the other hand, an alien who has the status of a commuter must notify the Commis- sioner of his current address in compliance with section 35 of the Alien Registration Act of 1940, as amended, and regulations issued thereunder. However, as part and parcel of this policy has been the holding that the commuter who has been out of employment in the United States for 6 months is, notwithstanding temporary entries in the meanwhile for other than employment purposes, deemed to have abandoned his status of a permanent resident in the United States and thereafter, if he seeks to reenter, is not admissible without again qualifying for admission as a permanent resident. Thus, in Matter of D C--, 3 I. Sr N. Dec. 519 (1949), the alien, a native and citizen of Canada, was admitted to the United States for permanent residence on May 25, 1948, and on the same date was issued a resi- dent alien's border-crossing identification card, the validity of which expired on May 22, 1949. He returned to Canada on the same date of his admission and had no intention of residing here and never had employment here but merely made several temporary visits always with the intention of returning to his home in Canada. On December 13, 1948, during the period of validity of his resident alien's border-crossing identification card, he sought to enter for the purpose of seeking employment. His possession of the unexpired resident alien's border-crossing card did not avail him when seeking 'Matter of D—C--, 3 I. & N. Dec. 526, 527, Editor's note.

admission as an immigrant because he was not considered as a returning legal resident within the purview of section 4(b) of the Immigration Act of 1524. It i3 to bo noted that in that, case the applicant was not in fact a commuter because he had never been employed in this country and had not been employed for a period of more than 6 months prinr to his application for adfaission with the border-crossing card. Thus, it would appear that a commuter is entitled to readmission as a returning resident, but that the pri- mary consideration is that he maintain the status of a commuter. As a corollary requirement, he must also comply with the condi- tions controlling the use of border-crossing cards. In the instant cases, the applicants had been employed in the United States for periods of approximately 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 5 months, respectively. Their jobs were then terminated. Since that time all of the applicants have been employable for more than 6 months but have been unable to obtain work in the United States during that period. At least one has done odd jobs in Canada and two have no assurance of resuming their jobs. The eireumotanees presented here differ from those in Matter of L—, 4 I. & N. Dec. 454. There the applicant had been steadily employed in the United States by one firm for 25 years, was disabled by illness for 5 months and sought entry into the United States 6 months and 1 week after he was absent from his job to resume his employment. In view of the fact that there was no evident intention to abandon commuter status, that he had never lost his job which was being held open and was available to him during the period of his absence, that the illness tolled the 6-month period until he was again employable, he was admitted as a returning re s ident. In the eaoeo before nc, it is evident that the previous employment in the United States had been lost and were not avail- able during the 6 months or more of unemployment. Under the historical policy set out above, they are no longer to be regarded as possessing the status of commuters and the fact that their resident alien's border - crossing card or its substitute, the Alien -Registration Receipt Card, Form 1 - 151, may still be valid does not avail the applicants inasmuch as they- are not eligible for the commuter status. The appeals of the district directors will be sustained and exclusion will be ordered. Order: It ifi; ordered that the appeals of the district dir,ieto•c from the decisions of the special inquiry officers be sustained and that the aliens be excluded on the documentary grounds set forth in the caption.