Rooks v. State, 102 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Rooks v. State, 102 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Clautide Jean-Pierre, James Jean-Pierre, and Reynold Jean-Pierre v. Madeline Glaberman (fladistctapp, 2016-05-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clautide Jean-Pierre, James Jean-Pierre, and Reynold Jean-Pierre v. Madeline Glaberman
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
In Blue Infiniti, LLC v. Wilson, 170 So.3d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), we explained: *614 Additionally, the 'only finding that the trial court made in its order Was its “finding the Civil RICO claim was frivolous.” This falls short of the requirement that the trial court make detailed and specific findings of bad faith. “[I]f the trial court concludes that an award of fees under section 57,105 is an appropriate sanction, ‘it should recite in its order the facts upon which it bases that conclusion.’ ” Logo, 120 So.3d at 75 (quoting Regions Bank v. Gad, 102 So.3d 666, 667 (Fla. 1st DCA …
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Blue Infiniti, LLC and Jorge Diaz-Cueto v. Annette Cassells Wilson and Ricky Wilson
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
Additionally, the only finding that the trial court made in its order was its “finding the Civil RICO claim was frivolous.” This falls short of the requirement *141 that the trial court make detailed and specific findings of bad faith. “[I]f the trial court concludes that an award of fees under section 57.105 is an appropriate sanction, ‘it should recite in its order the facts upon which it bases that conclusion.’” Lago, 120 So.3d at 75 (quoting Regions Bank v. Gad, 102 So.3d 666, 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)); see also Avis Rent A Car Sys., Inc. v. Newman, 641 So.2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 19…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Lago v. Kame By Design, LLC
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
Regions Bank v. Gad, 102 So.3d 666, 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
Robert ROOKS
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 2D11-3510.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan 18, 2012.
102 So. 3d 666
Robert Rooks, pro se.
Silberman, Villanti, Whatley.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), review dismissed, 29 So.3d 291 (Fla.2010); Ward v. State, 946 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Clayton v. State, 904 So.2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Wright v. State, 834 So.2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Sampson v. State, 832 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

SILBERMAN, C.J., and WHATLEY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.