Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So. 3d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So. 3d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: NORTH LAUDERDALE SUPERMARKET, INC. d/b/a SEDANO'S SUPERMARKET 35 v. LUZ PUENTES and JAIRO GARCIA (fladistctapp, 2021-12-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) NORTH LAUDERDALE SUPERMARKET, INC. d/b/a SEDANO'S SUPERMARKET 35 v. LUZ PUENTES and JAIRO GARCIA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Kaitlyn R. Turner v. Richard Gamiz (4×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
cited Cited as authority (rule) R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Linda Prentice, as Personal etc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
cited Cited as authority (rule) PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. BERNICE MCCALL
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Colette S. O'Hara, as Personal Rep. etc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So.3d 465, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012): A trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to give a proposed instruction that is (1) an accurate statement of the law, (2) supported by the facts of the case, and (3) necessary for the jury to properly resolve the issues, so long as the subject o'f the proposed instruction is not covered in other instructions given to the jury and the failure to instruct is shown to be prejudicial.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Crane Co. v. DeLisle
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Reynolds v. Jewett, 106 So.3d 465, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So.3d 465, 469 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
cited Cited as authority (rule) fladistctapp 2016
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So. 3d 465, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citations omitted).
examined Cited as authority (rule) William P. Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (4×)
Fla. · 2015 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So.3d 465, 469 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Belanger v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
Reynolds Tobacco v. Jewett, 106 So.3d 465, 472 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), reversed a jury verdict in favor of an Engle plaintiff who died from COPD based on the failure to provide the jury with the following special jury instruction requested by R.J.
cited Cited "see" William Hecht v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
11th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carter, 778 So.2d at 937 and Jewett, 106 So.3d at 469-70 .
Lucille Ruth SOFFER, as personal representative of the Estate of Maurice Benson SOFFER
v.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
No. 1D11-3724.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 2, 2013.
106 So. 3d 465
John S. Mills, The Mills Firm, Tallahassee, Mark A. Avera, Rod Smith, Dawn M. Vallejos-Nichols, Avera & Smith, Gaines-ville, and James W. Gustafson, Jr., Searcy Denney Searola Barnhart & Shipley, Tallahassee, for Appellant., Robert B. Parrish, Moseley, Pritchard, Parrish, Knight & Jones, Jacksonville, and Gregory G. Katsas, Jones Day, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Davis, Lewis, Makar.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

ON APPELLANT/CROSS-APPEL-LEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC AND APPELLEE/CROSS-APPEL-LANT’S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In our original opinion, we affirmed the cross-appeal without comment. We grant rehearing to clarify that we affirm R.J. Reynolds’s third issue on appeal — namely, whether the trial court’s application of factual findings established in Engle violated R.J. Reynolds’s due process rights — on the authority of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Martin, 53 So.3d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), review denied, 67 So.3d 1050 (2011), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1794, 182 L.Ed.2d 617 (2012), and Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 83 So.3d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), review granted, No. SC12-617 (2012). We otherwise deny rehearing, rehearing en banc, and certification.

DAVIS, LEWIS, and MAKAR, JJ„ concur.