green
Positive treatment
14.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Michael Klein v. 17121 Jade Ocean Condo, LLC
Co. v. Simpkins, 99 So. 2d 557, 561 (Fla. 1957) and Chavez v. McDonald’s Rest. of Fla., Inc., 108 So. 3d 1124, 1126 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013))); Anderson-Moody 5 v. Wilson, 357 So. 3d 1240 , 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023) (“[A]lthough ‘an expert may be qualified by experience,’ it does not follow ‘that experience, standing alone, is a sufficient foundation rendering reliable any conceivable opinion the expert may express.’ ‘When an expert is relying primarily on experience, the witness must explain how that experience leads to the opinion, why the experience is a sufficient basis for the opi…
STATE of Florida
v.
Alan Ray PAULK
v.
Alan Ray PAULK
No. 5D12-2409.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 15, 2013.
Brad King, State Attorney, and Brian Trehy, Assistant State Attorney, of Fifth Judicial Circuit, Inverness, for Petitioner., Michael R. Buchanan, of Dethomasis & Buchanan, P.A., Gainesville, for Respondent.
Evander, Jacobus, Sawaya.
Published
Petitioner, State of Florida, seeks certio-rari review of an order rendered on June 14, 2012, requiring the State to produce certain materials that the State alleges will result in material harm if disclosed. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we conclude that the order under review departs from the essential requirements of the law and results in material injustice. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988). We therefore quash the order under review and remand this case for further proceedings.
PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.