Atl. Coast Line R.R. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co., 112 So. 70 (Fla. 1927). · Go Syfert
Search
Atl. Coast Line R.R. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co., 112 So. 70 (Fla. 1927). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Davis (fla, 1971-01-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1927 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1927 1976 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" State v. Davis
Fla. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. State, 93 Fla. 238 , 112 So. 70 .
cited Cited "see" Sanchez v. State
Fla. · 1938 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. State, 93 Fla. 238 , 112 So. 70 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Crawford v. State
Fla. · 1927 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Smith v. The State, 112 So. 70 .
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Florida Fine Fruit Company, a Corporation, Respondent
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 21, 1927.
112 So. 70
Doggett, Christie Doggett, for Petitioner; P. L. Gaskins, John F. Hall and Gary W. Alexander, for Respondent.
Terrell.
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Terrell, J.

Careful examination of the record in this cause disclosed that the parties, the issues and the questions of law raised herein are identical to the parties, the issues and the question of law raised in Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation, v. Florida Fine Fruit Company, a Corporation, Number 538-Ap., decided this term, so the judgment of the Civil Court of Record as affirmed by the Circuit Court of Duval County is quashed on authority of that case.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Addendum

Per Curiam.

Petition for rehearing on the part of respondent was granted in this cause for the purpose of[*172] further considering whether or not the petition for certiorari should be denied on the ground that a good ease was made on the general negligence and delay counts.

The record has been carefully re-examined. The verdict was general and the errors on which the judgment below was quashed so permeated and effected the entire proceeding we think that our former judgment herein must be and is hereby approved and the judgment of the Civil Court of Record as affirmed by the Circuit Court of Duval County is hereby quashed.

All concur.