green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
27.1 score
“he facts are critical . . . .”
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
KEVIN PATRICK KELLEY, JR. vs STATE OF FLORIDA
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
he facts are critical . . . .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
William Franklin Scott Jr v. State of Florida
A trial court’s ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal is reviewed de novo, “with the evidence and all reasonable inferences from the evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the State.” Kish v. State, 145 So. 3d 225, 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Justin Lee Lanier v. State of Florida
It is “consciously doing an act or following a course of conduct that the defendant must have known, or reasonably should have known, was likely to cause death or great bodily harm.” Kish v. State, 145 So. 3d 225, 228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (quoting Fla. Std.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Kite
Viewing this evidence and permissible inferences in, a light most favorable to the State, see generally Kish v. State, 145 So.3d 225, 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), we conclude the State presented sufficient evidence of an ongoing relationship between Kite and Peterson involving Kite’s repeated purchases and deliveries of pseudoephedrine to Peterson, allowing the jury to properly infer there was a conspiracy between the two men specifically for the purchase and 'delivery of 28 grams or more of pseudoephedrine to be used to manufacture methamphetamine.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kenneth Grandison v. State of Florida
Viewed in a light most favorable to the State, see generally Kish v. State, 145 So.3d 225, 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), the evidence, and the permissible inferences from the evidence, cannot support a finding of guilt on the three counts at issue.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Medina v. State
(4×)
See Ramos v. State, 89 So.3d 1119, 1120 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“Mere negligence in the care of one’s young child doesn’t necessarily amount to culpable negligence.”); see, e.g., Kish v. State, 145 So.3d 225, 228-29 (Fla 1st DCA 2014) (holding that, although unwise, leaving three sick and young children unsupervised at a trusted caregiver’s home for a couple of hours did not rise to the level of culpable negligence because the defendant “tried to provide for [the] children’s safety” and the children were able to care for themselves); Bernard v. State, 769 So.2d 1066, 1067-68 (Fla.…
Charles R. CORDA
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, etc.
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, etc.
No. 3D14-1839.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 26, 2014.
Charles R. Corda, in proper person., Victoria Méndez, City Attorney, and John A. Greco, Deputy City Attorney, and Warren Bittner, Deputy Emeritus, and Forrest L. Andrews, Assistant City Attorney; Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Alan T. Dimond, Elliot H. Scherker and Brigid F. Cech Samóle; White & Case LLP, and Raoul G. Cantero and Evan M. Golden-berg; Feigeles Avallone & Haimo LLP, and Julie Feigeles; R.A. Cuevas, Jr., Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Michael B. Valdes, Assistant County Attorney, for ap-pellees.
Emas, Fernandez, Wells.
Published
Affirmed. Charter Review Comm’n of Orange Cnty. v. Scott, 647 So.2d 835 (Fla.1994); Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 394 So.2d 981 (Fla.1981).