Rood v. State, 147 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Rood v. State, 147 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a dismissal based on lack of standing raises a question of law that is reviewed de novo.”
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Estate of Patricia McLain, McLain, Jr. v. Guardianship of Patricia A. McLain (fladistctapp, 2025-04-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Estate of Patricia McLain, McLain, Jr. v. Guardianship of Patricia A. McLain
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
a dismissal based on lack of standing raises a question of law that is reviewed de novo.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) QUANAVIS LADON PENDER vs STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
“The phrase ‘corpus delicti’ refers to proof independent of a confession that the crime charged was in fact committed.” Meyers v. State, 704 So. 2d 1368, 1369 (Fla. 1997) (citing Bassett v. State, 449 So. 2d 803, 807 (Fla. 1984)). “[U]nder the corpus delicti rule, the State has the burden of proving, by substantial evidence, that a crime was committed before a defendant’s confession can be admitted in evidence.” Scott v. State, 147 So. 3d 5, 6 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (quoting Martin v. State, 911 So. 2d 821, 822 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Walt McCoy Porter v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
Under the corpus delicti rule, the State has the burden of proving by substantial evidence that a crime was committed before a defendant’s confession can be admitted into evidence. * Scott v. State, 147 So. 3d 5, 6 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State Of Washington v. Zaida Cardenas-flores
Wash. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Ct. App. 2014); Scott v. State, 147 So.3d 5, 6 (Fla. L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert Lenoir v. State of Mississippi
Miss. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Nevertheless, “Mississippi appellate courts may not consider information that is outside the record.” Hardy v. Brock, 826 So. 2d 71, 76 (Miss. 2002) (citing Dew v. Langford, 666 So. 2d 739, 746 (Miss. 1995)); see also Shumake v. Shumake, 147 So. 3d 5 Although the reason is unknown, it is likely that a filed-stamped copy of the April 6, 2021 order was inadvertently undisclosed since the order was filed in a miscellaneous file.
Charles Ernest ROOD, Jr.
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 1D12-5617.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 14, 2012.
147 So. 3d 5
Charles Ernest Rood, Jr., pro se, Petitioner., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Marstiller, Padovano, Swanson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., Concur.