green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
POPS FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, LTD. v. THOMAS F. KELLY
See Jenkins v. Eckerd Corp., 913 So. 2d 43, 53 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ("The concept of integration is based on a presumption that the parties to a written contract intended that writing 'to be the sole expositor of their agreement.' " (quoting Everglade Lumber Co. v. Nettleton Lumber Co., 149 So. 736, 738 (1933))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harkless v. Laubhan
(2×)
See Jenkins v. Eckerd Corp., 913 So. 2d 43, 53 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ("The concept of integration is based on a presumption that the parties to a written contract intended that writing 'to be the sole expositor of their agreement.' " (quoting Everglade Lumber Co. v. Nettleton Lumber Co., 149 So. 736, 738 (Fla. 1933))).
H. D. Goode
v.
Thomas A. Johnson Et Al.
v.
Thomas A. Johnson Et Al.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 5, 1933.
F. W. Marsh, for Plaintiff in Error;
John S. Beard and John B. Jones, for Defendants in Error.
Davis, Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford.
Published
Since the judgment herein was rendered on the pleadings in the cause, the Federal Supreme Court in Nixon v. Condon, 286 U. S. 73, 52 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 76 L. Ed. 629 (See also White v. County Democratic Executive Committee, 60 Fed. [2nd] 973; West v. Bliley, 33 Fed. Rep. [2nd] 177; Bliley v. West, 42 Fed. Rep. [2nd] 101), has announced pertinent principles which had not theretofore been adjudicated by the controlling authority and which could not have been considered in rendering the judgment in this cause; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.