Kadyebo v. State, 15 So. 3d 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Kadyebo v. State, 15 So. 3d 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Erin Vontez Thompson v. State of Florida (fladistctapp, 2018-05-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Erin Vontez Thompson v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Bittle v. State, 100 So. 3d 1194, 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (approving an oral finding of willful and substantial violation); Kadyebo v. State, 15 So. 3d 928, 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (recognizing oral pronouncement of willful and substantial violation as supported by competent substantial evidence); Baldwin v. State, 855 So. 2d 1180, 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (affirming revocation where competent substantial evidence supported an oral pronouncement of willfulness).
discussed Cited "see" T.M.F. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: accord · confidence high
See Rodriguez v. State , 777 So.2d 1175 , 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding the written probation revocation order "must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement" (citing Robinson v. State , 763 So.2d 1058 , 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ) ); see also Manis v. State , 30 So.3d 586 , 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (finding that the trial court in a VOP case "must specify in the written order or judgment what conditions the defendant violated" (quoting Mormon v. State , 976 So.2d 1188 , 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) ) ); accord Kadyebo v. State , 15 So.3d 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (citing Young v. State , 4…
discussed Cited "see" T.M.F. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: accord · confidence high
See Rodriguez v. State, 777 So. 2d 1175, 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding the written probation revocation order "must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement" (citing Robinson v. State, 763 So. 2d 1058, 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999))); see also Manis v. State, 30 So. 3d 586, 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (finding that the trial court in a VOP case "must specify in the written order or judgment what conditions the defendant violated" (quoting Mormon v. State, 976 So. 2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008))); accord Kadyebo v. State, 15 So. 3d 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (citing Young v. State, 4 So. 3d…
cited Cited "see" Manis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Kadyebo v. State, 15 So.3d 928 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); Young v. State, 4 So.3d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).
Emanuel Jason KADYEBO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee
5D08-2008.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 7, 2009.
15 So. 3d 928
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant., Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
Monaco, Griffin, Torpy.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
MONACO, C.J.

The appellant, Emanuel Kadyebo, seeks review of the sentence he received after the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We find no error and affirm. We note, however, that there appears to be no written order that comports with the oral pronouncements made by the trial judge in open court concerning which conditions of probation were violated. While we recognize that the trial court made findings from the bench that were supported by competent, substantial evidence, the appellant is unquestionably entitled to a correct written revocation order that conforms to the oral pronouncements finding him in willful violation of probation. See Young v. State, 4 So.3d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 847 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation and the sentence announced, but remand this[*929] matter to the trial court for entry of a proper violation order.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.