green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United Automobile Ins. Co. v. Partners in Health Chiropractic Center
Hackney Co., 159 So. 3d 1002, 1004-05 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Laughlin-Alfonso, 118 So. 3d at 315 (“To determine whether State Farm’s settlement offer was justified, we consider whether the record demonstrates conclusively that, at the time [the offer] was made, [State Farm] . . . had a reasonable basis . . . to conclude that [its] exposure was nominal.”) (internal citations omitted) (alterations in original); Event Servs.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Taylor Engineering, Inc. and Robert J. Wagner, P.E. v. Dickerson Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation
Hackney Co., 159 So.3d 1002, 1004-05 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (footnote omitted) (“The determination of whether a ‘nominal’ offer is in good faith requires the trial court to consider whether the offeror had a reasonable basis to conclude, at the time of making the offer, that its exposure was nominal.”); Downs v. Coastal Sys.
ST. AUGUSTINE-ST. JOHNS COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY
v.
Dennis W. HOLLINGSWORTH, etc.
v.
Dennis W. HOLLINGSWORTH, etc.
No. 5D14-893.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 24, 2015.
James G. Whitehouse and Douglas N. Burnett, of St. Johns Law Group, St. Augustine, for Appellant., Frank D. Upchurch, III, of Upchurch, Bailey & Upchurch, St. Augustine, for Ap-pellee.
Evander, Lawson, Palmer.
Published
AFFIRMED. See Canaveral Port Auth. v. Dep’t. of Rev., 690 So.2d 1226 (Fla.1996); Capital City Country Club, Inc. v. Tucker, 613 So.2d 448 (Fla.1993); City of Orlando v. Hausman, 534 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).