Guzman v. State, 16 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Guzman v. State, 16 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fortson v. State (fladistctapp, 2015-11-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Fortson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
“The offense of possession of burglary tools requires proof that the defendant used or intended to use the tools in the course of unlawfully entering the premises of another, which is not satisfied by proof that the defendant intended to use the tools to commit an offense after entering the premises.” Hardwick v. State, 16 So.3d 1045, 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Elvin GUZMAN, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
3D09-1049.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 9, 2009.
16 So. 3d 1045
Gersten and Lagoa, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge.
Published

Elvin Guzman, in proper person.

Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney, and Penny H. Brill, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN and LAGOA, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Clowers v. State, 960 So.2d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).