Gonzalez-Diaz v. State, 173 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Gonzalez-Diaz v. State, 173 So. 3d 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dominguez v. State of Florida (fladistctapp, 2026-02-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Dominguez v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2026 · confidence medium
See id. at 1303 ; Mizner v. State, 18 154 So. 3d 391, 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Holt v. State, 173 So. 3d 1079, 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) GERARDO SANCHEZ, SR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
As is clear from the statutory language, the offense has two elements: "(1) the use of a two-way communications device (2) for the purpose of facilitating or furthering the -7- commission of any felony offense." Holt v. State, 173 So. 3d 1079, 1082 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (quoting Exantus v. State, 198 So. 3d 1, 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Brian Mitchell Lee v. State of Florida
Fla. · 2018 · confidence medium
As a result, the State charged the offenses as occurring during a single criminal episode, and we may not assume that they were predicated on distinct acts. 173 So.3d at 1081 (emphasis added) (citing Mizner , 154 So.3d at 400 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) MICHAEL GENE KANIA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
Id. 1He was sentenced to seven years in prison followed by eight years' sex offender probation on the traveling count and to five years' sex offender probation on the unlawful use count, to run concurrently with the probation on the traveling count. -2- In Rubio v. State, 233 So. 3d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), this court relied on Mizner and held that the defendant's convictions for traveling to meet a minor and unlawful use of a two-way communications device violated double jeopardy "because the amended information charged [the defendant] with committing both of those offenses within the same tim…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bermudez v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
See Batchelor v. State, 193 So.3d 1054, 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); Mizner v. State, 154 So.3d 391, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Holt v. State, 173 So.3d 1079, 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
examined Cited as authority (rule) State of Florida v. Brian Mitchell Lee (4×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
As a result, the State charged the offenses as occurring during a single criminal episode, and we may not assume that they were predicated on distinct acts.” Holt v. State, 173 So. 3d 1079, 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
examined Cited as authority (rule) MATTHEW JOSEPH DETTLE v. State of Florida (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
Even if he had not raised the issue, “a violation of a defendant’s substantive double jeopardy rights constitutes fundamental error [which] may be raised for the first time on appeal.” Holt v. State, 173 So. 3d 1079, 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (considering double jeopardy issue applied to convictions under §§ 847.0135(4) and 934.15, Fla. Stat.). 2 In the initial opinion we vacated the conviction and sentence for count III.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Batchelor v. State (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Accord Hamilton v. State, 163 So.3d 1277, 1278-79 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Holubek v. State, 173 So.3d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Holt v. State, 173 So.3d 1079, 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
cited Cited "see" Wagner v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holubek v. State, 173 So.3d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) and Holt v. State, 173 So.3d 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
cited Cited "see, e.g." David F. Honaker v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Holt v. State, 173 So.3d 1079, 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Hamilton v. State, 163 So.3d 1277, 1279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Michael R. Mills v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Shelley, 176 So.3d 914, 919 (Fla.2015); see also Holt v. State, 173 So.3d 1079 ; 1081-84 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
cited Cited "see, e.g." David Leon Lashley v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Holt v. State, 173 So.3d 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." MATTHEW JOSEPH DETTLE v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Holt v. State, 173 So.3d 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Holubek v. State, 173 So.3d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). 1 We affirm Appellant’s convictions for travelling to meet a minor after using a computer to solicit the minor, under section 847.0135(4) and for using a computer or other device capable of electronic data storage to solicit a person believed to be a child to commit an illegal act, in violation of section 847.0135(3)(a), Florida Statutes, because the illegal acts solicited are separate illegal acts in this case.
Juan GONZALEZ-DIAZ
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D15-1212.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 12, 2015.
173 So. 3d 1079
Juan Gonzalez-Diaz, in proper person., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Fernandez, Logue, Salter.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed as to both of the orders on review: (1) the order of April 17, 2015, prohibiting the appellant from filing any further pro se proceedings, and (2) the order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800.