green
Positive treatment
10.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. HUGO A. TROCHEZ
Corbitt v. Alletag, 156 So. 3d 1110 , 1112 n.2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“[A] request for DNA testing in a [Department of Revenue]-initiated child support proceeding is properly viewed as a discovery request.”); State v. Ceasar, 188 So. 3d 989, 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding father’s motion for genetic testing essentially sought discovery where father did not plead basis to disestablish paternity and, thus, failed to place paternity in controversy); Dep’t of Revenue o/b/o Meeker v. Silva, 214 So. 3d 766, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (noting court order compelling paternity test was analogous t…
Dede NICHOLS, Appellant,
v.
MOORE, STEPHENS, LOVELACE, P.A., Appellee
v.
MOORE, STEPHENS, LOVELACE, P.A., Appellee
5D15-955.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Apr 22, 2016.
Denise M. Hammond and. Curtis L. Brown, of Wright, Fulford, Morehead & Brown, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Appellant., Todd K. Norman and Bernard H. Gentry, of Broad and Cassel, Orlando, for Appellee.
Cohen, Lambert.
Published
AFFIRMED. See Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. Carter, 9 So.3d 1258, 1263-64 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding noncompetition clause in an employment agreement to be valid and enforceable; the language of the clause was clear and unambiguous, reasonably limited in time, reasonably limited in not precluding all competition, and the lack of a geographical limitation was not critical).