Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 197 So. 3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 197 So. 3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Flatirons Bank v. the Alan W. Steinberg Limited Partnership (fladistctapp, 2017-12-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Flatirons Bank v. the Alan W. Steinberg Limited Partnership
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
We engage in the same exercise, de novo, Morejon v. Mariners Hosp., Inc., 197 So. 3d 591, 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), and agree with the trial court.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JORGE GONZALEZ-BARRERA v. MAJORCA TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. Ronco Inventions, LLC, 890 So. 2d 300, 304 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); see also Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 197 So. 3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 210 So. 3d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers Condo., Inc., 272 So. 3d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). 2
Jorge GONZALEZ-BARRERA and Abniel Garcia
v.
MAJORCA TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC.
Nos. 3D15-1928, 3D15-1370.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 1, 2016.
197 So. 3d 591
W. Sam Holland, for appellants., Becker & Poliakoff, Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal and Michael Gongora,-for appel-lee.
Emas, Rothenberg, Suarez.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that “[without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal”); Colucci v. Kar Kare Auto. Grp., Inc., 918 So.2d 431, 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (observing that the Florida Supreme Court has cautioned restraint when appellate courts review an order imposing injunctive relief that rests on factual matters and requires the trial court to exercise its sound discretion: “This is particularly true where the order relies on live testimony or -other evidence that the trial court is singularly well-suited to evaluate.”) (quoting Operation Rescue v. Women’s Health Ctr., 626 So.2d 664, 670 (Fla.1993), modified in part on other grounds sub nom. Madsen v. Women’s Health Ctr., Inc., 512 U.S. 753, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994)).