Love v. State, 198 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). · Go Syfert
Love v. State, 198 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“for better or for worse, it is settled that it is not enough for the plaintiff to 2 prove that it has standing when the case it tried; it must also prove that it had standing when the complaint was filed.”
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Henry Tien v. Antonia F. Abad (fladistctapp, 2024-03-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Henry Tien v. Antonia F. Abad
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
for better or for worse, it is settled that it is not enough for the plaintiff to 2 prove that it has standing when the case it tried; it must also prove that it had standing when the complaint was filed.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Verizzo v. The Bank of New York Mellon (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
ostfiling assignments of mortgage ... could establish only that acquired standing.in some manner after it filed the complaint.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Stoltz v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
for better or for worse, it is settled that it is not enough for the plaintiff to prove that it has standing when the case is tried; it must also prove that it had standing when the complaint was filed.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R Ex Rel. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. Asset Acquisitions & Holdings Trust
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
See Corrigan, 189 So.3d at 189 ; Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So.3d 48, 50-51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ("For better or for worse, it is settled that it is not enough for the plaintiff to prove that it has standing when the case is tried; it must also prove that it had standing when the complaint was filed.”).
cited Cited "see" Winchel v. PennyMac Corp.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So.3d 48, 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); May v. PHH Mortg.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." TONY ROBINSON AND DEBRA ROBINSON v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See Correa v. U.S. Bank N.A., 118 So. 3d 952, 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ("[A]ppellate courts do not generally provide parties with an opportunity to retry their case upon a failure of proof." (alteration in original) (quoting Morton's of Chicago, Inc. v. Lira, 48 So. 3d 76, 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)); see also Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So. 3d 48, 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Creadon v. U.S. Bank N.A., 166 So. 3d 952, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Russell, 163 So. 3d at 643 . -7- Reversed and remanded for entry of involuntary dismissal.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. U.S. Bank National Association
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Dickson v. Roseville Props., LLC, 198 So.3d 48, 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Creadon v. U.S. Bank N.A., 166 So.3d 952, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Russell, 163 So.3d at 643 ; Correa v. U.S. Bank N.A., 118 So.3d 952, 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).
Love
v.
State
2D15-94.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 4, 2015.
198 So. 3d 48
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOE LOVE, DOC# D12525 )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D15-94 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed November 4, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco
County; Pat Siracusa, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public
Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand solely for entry of a corrected written revocation order specifying the conditions of probation violated.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

-2-