green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Darling v. State
Payton v. State, 200 So.2d 255, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); see also Liotta v. State, 939 So.2d 338, 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dias v. State
See Scholl v. State, 94 Fla. 1138 , 115 So. 43 , 44 (1927); Reimel v. State, 532 So.2d 16, 18 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Payton v. State, 200 So.2d 255, 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bristow v. State
See also Payton v. State, 200 So.2d 255 (Fla.3d DCA 1967), where the court held that ordinarily the question of self-defense is one of fact to be determined by the trier of fact. [2] The second point that we shall address ourselves to is that concerning the alleged error of the trial court in denying defense counsel's request for a full reinstruction of the jury as to self-defense.
DADE CANVAS PRODUCTS CO., a Florida corporation
v.
Ben D. EWING and Ceil B. Ewing, his wife
v.
Ben D. EWING and Ceil B. Ewing, his wife
No. 66-781.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 27, 1967.
Rollins & Peeples, Miami, for appellant., Shutts & Bowen and Herbert L. Nadeau, Miami, for appellees.
Carroll, Hendry, Pearson.
Published
Affirmed. See Meyer v. Faust, Fla.1955, 83 So.2d 847; Yafanaro v. Ninos, Fla.App. 1960, 123 So.2d 286.