World Fin. Grp., Inc. v. South Beach Lending, LLC, 201 So. 3d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). · Go Syfert
World Fin. Grp., Inc. v. South Beach Lending, LLC, 201 So. 3d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“arbitrators have no inherent authority over a dispute or the parties to that dispute . . . .”
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: FOUNTAINBLEAU, L L C v. HIRE US, INC. (fladistctapp, 2019-06-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) FOUNTAINBLEAU, L L C v. HIRE US, INC.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
arbitrators have no inherent authority over a dispute or the parties to that dispute . . . .
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Fountainbleau, LLC v. Hire US, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
arbitrators have no inherent authority over a dispute or the parties to that dispute ....
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Fountainbleau, LLC v. Hire US, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
arbitrators have no inherent authority over a dispute or the parties to that dispute ....
cited Cited as authority (rule) OptumRX, as Successor by Merger to Catamaran Corporation, and Optumrx in Its Own Right v. Bay Pharmacy Inc., Bay Pharmacy Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
CT Miami, 201 So. 3d at 92 (citation omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Michael Shawn MacMullin v. Michael Findlay
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
Latinoamerica Miami, Inc., 201 So. 3d 85, 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Sanchez v. Cinque, 238 So. 3d 817, 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (holding that a typographical error in a proposal for settlement did not create an ambiguity invalidating the proposal; instead, it “must be read as a whole and is not ambiguous unless a genuine inconsistency, uncertainty, or ambiguity in meaning remains after resort to the ordinary rules of construction.”); Mathis v. Cook, 140 So. 3d 654 , 656 n.2 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (holding that the typographical errors in the release “d[id] not create an ambiguity.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) MARGUERITE MALEK v. PIERRE MARC MALEK (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
Latinoamerica Miami, Inc., 201 So. 3d 85, 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). 4 The ownership of Kymed for purposes of the dissolution action is not an arbitrable issue.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Comvest Imc Holdings v. Imc Group
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
Latinoamerica Miami, Inc., 201 So. 3d 85, 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Duty Free World v. Miami Perfume Junction
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
Latinoamerica Miami, Inc., 201 So. 3d 85, 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); accord Apartment Inv. & Mgmt.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kendall Imports, LLC v. Diaz
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence medium
The RFAC “governs an agreement to arbitrate made on or after July 1, 2013.” § 682.013, Fla. Stat. (2016); see also CT Miami, 201 So.3d at 91 (noting that “the parties correctly agree that the pre-2013 version of the [FAC] applies because the contract at issue was drafted and signed in 2009”).
WORLD FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
v.
SOUTH BEACH LENDING, LLC, etc.
Nos. 3D14-1501, 3D14-1138.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 9, 2015.
201 So. 3d 85
Shutts & Bowen LLP, and Stephen T. Maher, Miami, for appellants., Weiss Serota Helfman Cole Bierman & Popok, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes and Joseph H. Serota, Coral Gables, for appel-lee.
Logue, Salter, Scales.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (2)
PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who are defendants implead-ed into an action filed by South Beach Lending, LLC, seek review of the denial of their motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Based on the Mortgagee’s commendable confession of error, we reverse the order as to Andres Dyer Coriat. We affirm the orders as to all other Appellants. See Daimler AG v. Bauman, — U.S.—, 134 S.Ct. 746, 187 L.Ed.2d 624 (2014); Perkins v. Benguet Consol. Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437, 72 S.Ct. 413, 96 L.Ed. 485 (1952).