Mander v. Concreform Co., 212 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Mander v. Concreform Co., 212 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Metropolitan Dade County v. Rolle (fladistctapp, 1996-08-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Metropolitan Dade County v. Rolle
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · confidence medium
The JCC below specifically emphasized in his order a statement in Mander that attorney's fees bear interest from the date of the award, "unless the award is reversed on review or appeal." Mander, 212 So.2d at 631 (emphasis added).
discussed Cited "see" Wells Fargo Armored Services v. Lee
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mander v. Concreform Co., 212 So.2d 631 (Fla.1968); Stone v. Jeffres, 208 So.2d 827 (Fla.1968); Metropolitan Dade County v. Rolle, 678 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (on reh'g); Spaulding v. Albertson's, Inc., 610 So.2d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Okaloosa County Gas Dist. v. Mandel, 394 So.2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). *286 In allowing prejudgment interest, the JCC relied on the Florida Supreme Court's opinion in Quality Engineered Installation, Inc., and this court's initial opinion in Metropolitan Dade County v. Rolle.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pinellas County School Board v. Rapson
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Mander v. Concreform Company, 212 So.2d 631 (Fla.1968); Stone v. Jeffres, 208 So.2d 827 (Fla.1968), and Cantillo v. Gator Shoe Corp., 389 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Albert J. MANDER
v.
CONCREFORM COMPANY, Inc., and Bituminous Casualty Corporation
No. 37158.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 26, 1968.
212 So. 2d 631
David T. Henniger of Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg & Rogers, St. Petersburg, for petitioner., E. O. Palermo of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for respondents.
Adams, Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Spector, Thornal.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We have for review on conflict cer-tiorari a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Mander v. Concreform Company, Inc., 206 So.2d 662. This case presents the same issue which was decided in Stone v. Jeffres, Fla., 208 So.2d 827, wherein we held attorneys’ fees bear interest from the date of the award thereof by a Deputy Commissioner of the Florida Industrial Commission, unless the award is reversed on review or appeal.

Accordingly, the decision below is quashed and the cause remanded for entry of a judgment in accordance herewith.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.