Armstrong v. State, 214 So. 3d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Armstrong v. State, 214 So. 3d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Hill v. Hill (fladistctapp, 2018-05-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hill v. Hill
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
After a review of the record, including the transcript from the hearing described in Hill’s motion to disqualify, we conclude that comments made by the judge at that hearing “were sufficient to put a reasonably prudent person in well-founded fear of not receiving a fair or impartial hearing or trial.” State v. Gresham, 214 So. 3d 780, 781 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (citing Shuler v. Green Mountain Ventures, Inc., 791 So. 2d 1213, 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that fear of judicial bias giving rise to disqualification motion must be objectively reasonable)).
Shawn Patrick ARMSTRONG
v.
STATE of Florida
Case No. 2D15-5286.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 31, 2017.
214 So. 3d 780
John H. Trevena, Trevena, Pontrello & Associates, Largo, for Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Larose, Lucas, Wallace.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a motion to correct sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

WALLACE, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.