green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Florida Department of Revenue, on behalf of Sharon Wind v. Mark Cochran
See Dep’t of Revenue v. Osagie, 229 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (striking answer brief to the extent it sought affirmative relief because the appellee had not filed a cross-appeal). 5 Although not raised by the Department, we note that the ALJ failed to explain why the reduced child support obligation commenced on November 1 when the ALJ found that the child was not due to be born until November 30. 3 raise this issue at the hearing because (1) the father did not request a Smith/Speed credit for his then-unborn child at any point in the proceedings, and (2) the ALJ took the case under ad…
discussed
Cited "see"
Florida Department of Revenue, on behalf of Sharon Wind v. Mark Cochran
See Dep’t of Revenue v. Osagie, 229 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (striking answer brief to the extent it sought affirmative relief because the appellee had not filed a cross-appeal). 5 Although not raised by the Department, we note that the ALJ failed to explain why the reduced child support obligation commenced on November 1 when the ALJ found that the child was not due to be born until November 30. 3 raise this issue at the hearing because (1) the father did not request a Smith/Speed credit for his then-unborn child at any point in the proceedings, and (2) the ALJ took the case under ad…
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Esther Taiye Lamidi
v.
Johnston E. OSAGIE
v.
Johnston E. OSAGIE
CASE NO. 1D16-3584.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 27, 2017.
229 So. 3d 1289
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant., Terry P. Roberts, Tallahassee, for Ap-pellee.
Jay, Thomas.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
We affirm without discussion. We further strike appellee’s answer brief to the extent it seeks affirmative relief because appellee failed to file a cross-appeal. See Premier Indus. v. Mead, 595 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); A-1 Racing Specialties, Inc. v. K & S Imports of Broward Cty., Inc., 576 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).