Maqueira v. State, 229 So. 3d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Maqueira v. State, 229 So. 3d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“florida's courts are 4 consistent in holding that undue burden or expense arising from a discovery order does not constitute irreparable harm.”
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Arlene Delgado v. Jason Miller (fladistctapp, 2025-10-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Arlene Delgado v. Jason Miller
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
florida's courts are 4 consistent in holding that undue burden or expense arising from a discovery order does not constitute irreparable harm.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Emmanuel Pacin v. Nicole Granja
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
Walgreen Co. v. Rubin, 229 So. 3d 418, 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Steven K. Schwartz, P.A. v. Banks
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
Walgreen Co. v. Rubin, 229 So. 3d 418, 420-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
discussed Cited "see" HAMMOCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Walgreen Co. v. Rubin, 229 So. 3d 418, 420-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (setting forth elements of certiorari relief, including a departure from the essential requirements of the law and a showing of irreparable harm); see also Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So. 2d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“It seems clear to us that the mere fact of unwarranted effort and expense is not, by itself, synonymous with a ‘departure from the essential requirements of law’ [e.s.] for which immediate review is necessary.”); Killinger v. Guardianship of Grable, 983 So. 2d 30, 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“W…
Jesus MAQUEIRA
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D16-1976.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 4, 2017.
229 So. 3d 418
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Joanne Diez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Rothenberg, Salter, Scales.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. McMillian v. State, 214 So.3d 1274, 1287 (Fla. 2017), and Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992) (orders regarding consolidation and severance under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.150 and 3.152 are reviewed for an abuse of discretion); Spencer v. State, 645 So.2d 377, 381-82 (Fla. 1994) (crimes separated by a substantial lapse of time can be causally related when “they all stem from the same underlying- dispute and involve the same parties”); Brunner v. State, 683 So.2d 1129, 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (affirming denial of motion to sever count charging aggravated stalking, “which occurred on dates prior to the murder,” with count charging first degree murder).