Griffin v. State, 23 So. 3d 140 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Griffin v. State, 23 So. 3d 140 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he courts of this state have uniformly recognized the availability of certiorari review in cases where the presuit notice requirements of chapter 766 have not been met.”
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Riggenbach v. Rhodes (fladistctapp, 2019-03-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Riggenbach v. Rhodes
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he courts of this state have uniformly recognized the availability of certiorari review in cases where the presuit notice requirements of chapter 766 have not been met.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Riggenbach v. Rhodes
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he courts of this state have uniformly recognized the availability of certiorari review in cases where the presuit notice requirements of chapter 766 have not been met.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. Oken (7×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. · 2011 · confidence medium
As articulated in the dissent, the First District should have instead dismissed the petition and remanded the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on whether Dr. Foster was qualified as an expert because it appears that “there is no doubt that Appellee complied with the presuit requirements of chapter 766; not one step was omitted.” Oken, 23 So.3d at 151 (Browning, J., dissenting).
cited Cited as authority (rule) GalenCare, Inc. v. Mosley
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
Oken v. Williams, 23 So.3d 140, 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Baptist Medical Center of the Beaches, Inc. v. Rhodin
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
See Miami Physical Therapy Assocs. v. Savage, 682 So.2d 114, 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Oken v. Williams, 23 So.3d 140, 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Holden v. Bober (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
As the First District noted in Oken v. Williams, 23 So.3d 140, 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), the term “similar specialty” has neither been defined by statute nor case law following the Florida Legislature’s amendment of section 766.102(5) in 2003.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jeffrey A. Hunt, D.O., P.A. v. Huppman (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
Preliminarily, we note that “the courts of this state have uniformly recognized the availability of *992 certiorari review in cases where the pre-suit notice requirements of chapter 766 have not been met.” Oken v. Williams, 23 So.3d 140, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Robert J. GRIFFIN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent
1D09-1361.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 29, 2009.
23 So. 3d 140
Robert J. Griffin, pro se, Petitioner., Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Webster, Davis, Lewis.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (2)
PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.