Waters Mark Dev. Enter., LC v. Brevard Cnty., 230 So. 3d 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). · Go Syfert
Waters Mark Dev. Enter., LC v. Brevard Cnty., 230 So. 3d 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 5039294.
WATERS MARK DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES, LC
v.
BREVARD COUNTY, Florida
Case No. 5D16-1302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct 20, 2017.
230 So. 3d 549
John H. Pelzer, Glenn N. Smith, and Elizabeth Adler, of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant., Dale A, Scott and Michael J. Roper, of Bell & Roper, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
Edwards, Eisnaugle, Torpy.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the. applicable statute of limitations did not commence to run until Appellee denied Appellant’s application for site plan approval on October 31, 2012. See M & H Profit, Inc. v. City of Panama City, 28 So.3d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). We distinguish Citrus County v. Halls River Development, Inc., 8 So.3d 413 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). In that case, the challenged government act involved the reclassification of the land use category on a particular piece of property.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause for further proceedings. In do» ing so, we express no view on the merits of the claim.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORPY, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.