Ott v. State, 237 So. 3d 463 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). · Go Syfert
Ott v. State, 237 So. 3d 463 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Heather Washington v. VyStar Credit Union (fladistctapp, 2026-02-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Heather Washington v. VyStar Credit Union (3×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2026 · confidence medium
Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lambert v. Emerald Publishing Limited (2×)
D. Mass. · 2025 · confidence medium
Ct. App. 2007), but, “in the absence of limiting terms like ‘if’, ‘provided that,’ or ‘on condition that,’ ‘whether a certain contractual provision is a condition, rather than a promise, must be gathered from the contract as a whole and from the intent of the parties,’” Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 466 (Fla. Dist.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Eduardo Gomez v. CVPort Services, LLC
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bluhm v. Wyndham Destinations Inc
M.D. Fla. · 2022 · confidence medium
Fla. Dec. 29, 2021) (“A contract is ambiguous when there are competing reasonable interpretations of the instrument, but ‘fanciful, inconsistent, and absurd interpretations’ do no not create ambiguity.” (quoting Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 467 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018))).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Aecom Technical Services, Inc. v. Professional Service Industries, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · 2021 · confidence medium
Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 467 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (quoting Vyfvinkel v. Vyfvinkel, 135 So. 3d 384, 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 12 2014)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Susan Snyder v. Florida Prepaid College Board
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
See CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Turner, 172 So. 3d 502, 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“A contract is ambiguous 11 when it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, but where one interpretation of a contract would be absurd and another would be consistent with reason and probability, the contract should be interpreted in the rational manner.” (internal quotation and citation omitted)); Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 466-67 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (recognizing a true ambiguity only exists when it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation).
cited Cited "see" PIAL HOLDINGS, LTD v. RIVERFRONT PLAZA, LLC
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (citing Jackson v. Shakespeare Found., Inc., 108 So. 3d 587 , 5 593 (Fla. 2013)).
discussed Cited "see" RAYMOND ERB v. CHUBB NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, etc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet Owner, LLC, 237 So. 3d 463, 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (internal quotations and citations omitted); see also City of Homestead v. Johnson, 760 So. 2d 80, 84 (Fla. 2000) (“[W]e rely upon the rule of construction requiring courts to read provisions of a contract harmoniously in order to give effect to all portions thereof.”).
Chasen Allen OTT
v.
STATE of Florida
Case No. 5D17–4087.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 9, 2018.
237 So. 3d 463
Amanda C. Micallef, of Law Offices of Amanda C. Micallef, P.A., Ocala, for Petitioner., No Appearance for Respondent.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the October 19, 2017, judgment and sentence in Case No. 2016-CF-87-A, in the Circuit Court in and for Citrus County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.