Ricardo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 35 So. 3d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Ricardo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 35 So. 3d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: CRMSuite Corporation v. General Motors Company (flmd, 2022-03-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) CRMSuite Corporation v. General Motors Company
M.D. Fla. · 2022 · confidence medium
Witt v. La Gorce Country Club, Inc., 35 So. 3d 1033, 1040 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) JILL PARDES, etc. v. ANDRIA PARDES (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
Witt, 35 So. 3d at 1040 (holding that, pursuant to section 44.104(11), an appellate court is “bound by the factual findings of the trial resolution judge”). 6 Former Wife’s Claims 1) Did the trial court err in failing to include the Stargate Mobile Investment in Former Husband’s net worth? 6 Even if we were to review this claim under a standard of competent substantial evidence, the same result would follow: The couple had marital problems for years, and each had their own money and assets.
cited Cited as authority (rule) CRMSuite Corporation v. General Motors Company
M.D. Fla. · 2021 · confidence medium
Witt v. La Gorce Country Club, Inc., 35 So. 3d 1033, 1040 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
discussed Cited "see" Munilla Constr. Mgmt., LLC v. Se. Eng'g Contractors, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Witt v. La Gorce Country Club, Inc. , 35 So.3d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) ("The trial resolution judge's findings of fact are not reviewable on appeal." (citing § 44.104(11), Fla. Stat. (2008) ("Factual findings determined in the voluntary trial are not subject to appeal.") ) ).
discussed Cited "see" Munilla Constr. Mgmt., LLC v. Se. Eng'g Contractors, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Witt v. La Gorce Country Club, Inc. , 35 So.3d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) ("The trial resolution judge's findings of fact are not reviewable on appeal." (citing § 44.104(11), Fla. Stat. (2008) ("Factual findings determined in the voluntary trial are not subject to appeal.") ) ).
discussed Cited "see" Frieri v. Capital Investment Services, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Witt v. La Gorce Country Club, Inc., 35 So.3d 1033, 1039-40 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (stating that a claim for fraudulent inducement requires proving a misrepresentation of a material fact); Romo v. Amedex Ins.
discussed Cited "see" JDI HOLDINGS, LLC v. Jet Management, Inc.
N.D. Fla. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Witt v. La Gorce Country Club, Inc., 35 So.3d 1033, 1040 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (explaining that whether conduct constitutes an unfair or deceptive trade practice is a question of fact and affirming a finding of no deceptive trade practice where there was no misrepresentation or deceptive non-disclosure).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Meyer v. Health Management Associates, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Witt v. La Gorce Country Club, Inc., 35 So.3d 1033, 1040 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Coastal Inv.
Julio A. RICARDO, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.
3D09-2316.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 2, 2010.
35 So. 3d 1033
Ramirez, C.J., and Cope and Shepherd.
Published

Joseph Perea, Miami, for appellant.

M. Elaine Howard, Tallahassee, Senior Attorney, for appellee, Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEPHERD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Miller v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 690 So.2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).