Gomez v. State, 37 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Gomez v. State, 37 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he rescission of previously awarded jail credit as an increased penalty and a violation of the defendant's rights under the fifth amendment of the united states constitution.”
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Joseph A. Barbesco v. State of Florida (fladistctapp, 2019-02-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Joseph A. Barbesco v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
he rescission of previously awarded jail credit as an increased penalty and a violation of the defendant's rights under the fifth amendment of the united states constitution.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Barbesco v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he rescission of previously awarded jail credit as an increased penalty and a violation of the defendant's rights under the fifth amendment of the united states constitution.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) O.H. v. AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · confidence medium
While it is not the function of an appellate court to “reweigh evidence to come to a conclusion different from that of a trier of fact,” there is no “obligat[ion] to affirm an unsupported legal determination.” Waggle Bros., Inc. v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Com’n, 37 So. 3d 873, 876 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Horace Cummings v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
“This court views the rescission of previously awarded jail credit as an increased penalty and a violation of the defendant's rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.” Session v. State, 37 So. 3d 873, 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Richard Alfred Washington v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Moreover, “[t]his court views the rescission of previously awarded jail credit as an increased penalty and a violation of the defendant’s rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.” Session v. State, 37 So.3d 873, 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
cited Cited "see" Davis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wheeler v. State, 880 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), Palmer v. State, 22 So.3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), and Session v. State, 37 So.3d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
Augusto GOMEZ, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
3D09-2147.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 14, 2009.
37 So. 3d 873
Cope and Gersten, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 82%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (2)

Augusto Gomez, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE and GERSTEN, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287 (Fla.2003).