Watson v. State, 392 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Watson v. State, 392 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases · "Non-appearance pursuant to an order of the court is normally considered a direct criminal contempt since it is committed in the immediate view and presence of the court."
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Stephen Richard WATSON
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 80-372.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 7, 1981.
392 So. 2d 60
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Michael Barnette, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.
Cowart, Orfinger, Sharp.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (2)
SHARP, Judge.

Both parties agree that error was committed when appellant was sentenced pursuant to a plea agreement to both first degree felony murder and the underlying felony of armed robbery. On the authority of State v. Pinder, 375 So.2d 836 (Fla.1979), we vacate the judgment and sentence for armed robbery.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.