yellow
Treated with caution
-0.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Smith v. Smith
But see Dix v. Dix, 400 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Harrison v. Harrison, 314 So.2d 812, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 334 So.2d 605 (Fla.1976); Abbott v. Abbott, 297 So.2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) (2-1 decision).
Kenneth E. DIX
v.
Ann E. DIX
v.
Ann E. DIX
No. 80-719.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jul 1, 1981.
Sidney M. Dubbin of the Law Offices of Sidney M. Dubbin, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Paula S. Gold of Baskin & Sears, Boca Raton, for appellee.
Anstead, Glickstein, Moore.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
AFFIRMED. We think the evidence, although in conflict, was sufficient to sustain the trial court’s finding that the wife was entitled to a special equity in the marital homeplace. Cf. Landay v. Landay, 400 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) and Weiss v. Weiss, 390 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). In so doing, we reject the appellant’s contention that such special equity must be proven to exist “beyond a reasonable doubt” and we recede from any statements to that effect contained in our opinion in Hanzelik v. Hanzelik, 294 So.2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). See Abbott v. Abbott, 297 So.2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); and Duncan v. Duncan, 356 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).