State v. Oden, 478 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Oden, 478 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ree v. State (fla, 1990-07-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ree v. State
Fla. · 1990 · confidence medium
In the companion case of State v. Oden, 478 So.2d 51, 51 (Fla. 1985) (quoting Oden v. State, 463 So.2d 313, 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)), we approved the First District's holding that "[i]t was reversible error for the trial court to depart from the guidelines without providing a contemporaneous written statement of the reasons therefor at the time each sentence was pronounced." (Emphasis added.) We conclude that Jackson and Oden compel us to answer the certified question in the affirmative and require that written reasons be issued at the time of sentencing.
cited Cited "see" Lewis v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla.1985); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Mark ODEN, et al., Respondents.
66650.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 31, 1985.
478 So. 2d 51
Per Curiam.
Cited by 19 opinions  |  Published

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Andrea Smith Hillyer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and Larry G. Bryant, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case, the district court held: "It was reversible error for the trial court to depart from the guidelines without providing a contemporaneous written statement of the reasons therefor at the time each sentence was pronounced." Oden v. State, 463 So.2d 313, 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). This holding conflicts with decisions of other district courts of appeal. We approve the instant decision based on our recent opinion in State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985).

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.