State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Garbett v. State (fladistctapp, 1986-02-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Garbett v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Prieto, 479 So.2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Yolman v. State, 473 So.2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 475 So.2d 696 (Fla.1985).
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Roberto PRIETO and Raul Nieves, Appellees.
85-848.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 17, 1985.
479 So. 2d 320
Barkdull, Hubbart and Baskin.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Howard Sohn, Miami, for appellee Raul Nieves.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the trial court's determination that State v. Glosson, 462 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1985), required dismissal of the criminal charges against defendants, Roberto Prieto and Raul Nieves. Dismissal of an information is not required under Glosson where, as here, payment to the confidential informant was contingent on the quantity of drugs seized and not on cooperation and trial testimony in the resulting criminal prosecution. We therefore hold that the trial court improperly dismissed the information. We reverse and remand as to both defendants.

Reversed and remanded.