Walker v. State, 496 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Walker v. State, 496 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Boomer v. State (fladistctapp, 1990-08-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Boomer v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Walker v. State, 496 So.2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
cited Cited "see" Rodriguez v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Walker v. State, 496 So.2d 220, 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Williams v. State, 462 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), review denied, 471 So.2d 44 (Fla.1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Saldana v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: compare · confidence low
See State v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526 (Fla.1987); Mackey v. State, 495 So.2d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); compare Walker v. State, 496 So.2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (violation involving threats to victim 74 days after commencement of term); Spivey v. State, 481 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (violation within one month of probation order); Williams v. State, 462 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (threats to assault victim’s father), pet. for review denied, 471 So.2d 44 (Fla.1985); Jean v. State, 455 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (repetition of same offense within one month of probation). 2.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Walker v. State, 496 So.2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
William WALKER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
85-2106.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 21, 1986.
496 So. 2d 220
Barkdull and Daniel S. Pearson and Ferguson.
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published

[*221] Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Ralph Barreira, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court's reasons for imposing a sentence upon the defendant above the recommended guideline range, that is, that the defendant violated his probation within 74 days of being placed on probation and that he threatened the victim and a witness in this grand theft case, are clear and convincing reasons for an upward departure from the guidelines, see Spivey v. State, 481 So.2d 100 (Fla.3d DCA 1986) (violation of probation within one month of probation order proper reason for departure); Williams v. State, 462 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (threats to assault victim's father approved as reason for departure from sentencing guidelines), rev. denied, 471 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1985), and are supported by the record in this case. The judgment and sentence are accordingly

Affirmed.