Fundora v. State, 508 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Fundora v. State, 508 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Fundora (fla, 1987-09-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Fundora
Fla. · 1987 · confidence medium
Relying on its decisions in Ginebra v. State, 498 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and Edwards v. State, 393 So.2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), the district court below reversed the trial court's summary denial of Fundora's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, finding that "1) appellant's contentions, that his counsel was ineffective in failing to inform Fundora of the possibility of deportation as a result of his guilty plea and that his pleas were made involuntary as a result of this lack of information, are valid grounds for collateral relief from his guilty pleas ... and 2) appellant s…
Gerardo FUNDORA
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 87-182.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 24, 1987.
508 So. 2d 1250
Gerardo Fundora, in pro. per., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Baskin, Jorgenson, Nesbitt.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Fundora appeals from the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We find that 1) appellant’s contentions, that his counsel was ineffective in failing to inform Fundo-ra of the possibility of deportation as a result of his guilty plea and that his pleas were made involuntary as a result of this lack of information, are valid grounds for collateral relief from his guilty pleas, see Ginebra v. State, 498 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Edwards v. State, 393 So.2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and 2) appellant sufficiently alleges facts which, if proven, would support his prayer for relief. Since the trial court failed to attach those portions of the record which would demonstrate that Fundora is not entitled to relief, we

Reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Ginebra, Edwards, and Rule 3.850.