Parrish v. State, 561 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Parrish v. State, 561 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Dejerez v. State (fladistctapp, 1991-05-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Dejerez v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Parrish v. State, 561 So.2d 685 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Allen v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
D'Alessandro v. Shearer, 360 So.2d 774, 775 (Fla.1978) (issuing mandamus requiring trial court to recite that five-year sentences were subject to three-year minimum mandatory provisions because without such a recitation the authorities would not be on notice that the case calls for a minimum of three years service in prison, and even if authorities received notice by other means, without a judicial order, it would be questionable whether minimum service was required); see also State v. Johnson, 627 So.2d 98 *535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (en banc) (receding from State v. Moran, 561 So.2d 685 (Fla. 4…
David J. PARRISH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
88-3005.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 23, 1990.
561 So. 2d 685
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes, and we agree, that it was error for the trial court to enter judgments of conviction for both driving under the influence (Count I) and driving with an unlawful blood alcohol level (Count II). See State v. Rolle, 560 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 1990). We find no other reversible error by the trial court. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction for Count II and remand with directions that such conviction be vacated, and affirm in all other respects.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.