Robbins v. Tabor, 573 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Robbins v. Tabor, 573 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Robbins v. Yusem (flacirct, 1991-06-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Robbins v. Yusem
Fla. Cir. Ct. · 1991 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Robbins v Tabor, 573 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (same, cattle pasture); Robbins v Stuart International Corp., 559 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA) (same) rev. denied, 574 So.2d 143 (Fla. 1990); Robbins v Carol Management Corp., 27 Fla. Supp.2d 38 (Dade County P.A.A.B. 1988); (340.74-acre parcel in unincorporated Dade County used for cattle pasture in 1987 and zoned RXJ-1 (Single-Family Residential), RU-TH (Townhouse), RU-L4 (Limited Apartment House), BU-2 (Special Business), IU-2 (Industrial, Heavy Manufacturing) ineligible for Greenbelt exemption), rev’d, 559 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev.…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kogan v. Robbins
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Robbins v. Tabor, 573 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1991).
Joel W. ROBBINS, as Property Appraiser of Dade County, Florida
v.
Martin A. TABOR, Sam D. Alexander, Acting Director of the Department of Revenue
No. 89-1950.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 29, 1991.
573 So. 2d 207
Robert A. Ginsburg, Dade County Atty., and Daniel A. Weiss, Asst. County Atty., for appellant., Fine Jacobson Schwartz Nash Block & England, and Bonnie J. Losak-Jimenez, Charles M. Auslander and Joanne M. Rose, for appellees.
Cope, Ferguson, Jorgenson.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The issue in this case is whether a taxpayer is entitled to an agricultural classification of property for tax purposes by virtue of its use for agriculture, where the property is zoned for commercial,, nonagri-cultural use. On the authority of Robbins v. Yusem, 559 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA) (unlawful physical agricultural use, inconsistent with permitted zoning, precludes agricultural tax classification), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1282 (Fla.1990), we reverse the judgment on the pleadings which dismissed the Property Appraiser’s complaint with prejudice.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.