Smith v. State, 574 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. State, 574 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7655461.
Fred Lee SMITH
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 89-0860.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 27, 1991.
574 So. 2d 1228
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Susan D. Cline, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Sylvia Alonso, Asst. Atty. General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Hersey, Letts, Stone.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to Point I on appeal. Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990).

We also affirm as to Point II on appeal. § 775.021(4), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Point III on appeal questions the imposition of costs without giving appellant adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. As we have done in numerous cases, we reverse the imposition of costs and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED,

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.