Humes v. State, 578 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Humes v. State, 578 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7657159.
Corey HUMES
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 90-1089.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 19, 1991.
578 So. 2d 317
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Louis Campbell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Neimand and Avi Litwin, Asst.. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Cope, Goderich, Levy.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Based upon the State’s concession that the trial court erred in failing to credit the defendant with an appropriate amount of time served when it re-sentenced him after revocation of his probation, this cause must be remanded to the trial court for the purpose of allowing the trial court to re-calculate the amount of time served for which the defendant must receive credit.

Because the errors that the appellant claims the trial court committed, in imposing the sentences that resulted from the plea bargain entered into by the appellant herein, do not render the original sentences void, the raising of these points now, several years after the imposition of the sentences in question, is, at best, untimely. See Gallagher v. State, 421 So.2d 581 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Affirmed.