Dep't of Revenue, Child Support v. Magrum, 59 So. 3d 333 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Dep't of Revenue, Child Support v. Magrum, 59 So. 3d 333 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 5049790.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT, etc.
v.
Travis MAGRUM
No. 5D10-2391.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Apr 21, 2011.
59 So. 3d 333
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant., No Appearance for Appellee.
Monaco, Orfinger, Sawaya.
Published
PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the record, we hold that the Department of Revenue is correct in its assertion that the circuit court’s final judgment on the Department’s Petition for Enforcement of Administrative Support Order did not prospectively change the child support amount established in the earlier Administrative Support Order and thus, pursuant to section 409.2568(10)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), the final judgment could not “supersede” the administrative order.

Accordingly, we affirm the Final Judgment on Petition for Enforcement of Administrative Support Order in all respects except in regard to the lower court’s attempt to have the final judgment supersede the administrative order. We remand to the circuit court with instructions to strike this provision.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.