Ursi v. Ursi, 62 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Ursi v. Ursi, 62 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alden Mitchell Howard v. State of Florida (fladistctapp, 2018-10-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Alden Mitchell Howard v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
It is error to admit a co-defendant’s confession that implicates a criminal defendant in the absence of specific guarantees of “trustworthiness.” DeWolfe v. State, 62 So. 3d 1142, 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (quoting Franqui v. State, 699 So. 2d 1312, 1318-19 (Fla. 1997)).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Joseph Eli Bearden v. State of Florida (9×)
Fla. · 2015 · confidence medium
Because we granted review based on express and direct conflict with the decision of the First District in DeWolfe, 62 So.3d at 1142, we discuss that decision next.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kaczmar v. State
Fla. · 2012 · confidence medium
This claim is without merit. “ ‘[T]he credibility of an in-court witness who is testifying with regard to an out-of-court declaration against penal interest is not a matter that the trial court should consider in determining whether to admit the testimony ... [ijnstead, it is the jury’s duty to assess the credibility of the in-court witness who is testifying about the out-of-court statement.’” Dewolfe v. State, 62 So.3d 1142, 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (quoting Carpenter v. State, 785 So.2d 1182, 1203 (Fla.2001)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vincent Martez Trawick v. State of Alabama.
Ala. Crim. App. · 2011 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Dewolfe v. State, 62 So.3d 1142 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2011) (holding that trial court erred when it prohibited two witnesses from testifying that they heard the unavailable witness state that he had committed the theft the defendant had been convicted of because the statements were declarations against penal interest), and Williams v. State, 295 Ga.App. 249 , 671 S.E.2d 268 (2008) (holding that third person’s statement naming someone other than defendant as the individual who stole victim’s vehicle was not self-incriminatory).
Gina URSI, Appellant,
v.
Steve URSI, Appellee.
3D10-431, 3D10-751.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 18, 2011.
62 So. 3d 1142
Gersten and Shepherd, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge.
Published

Barry S. Franklin, Aventura, for appellant.

Tracy Belinda Newmark, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).