Rozier v. State, 626 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Rozier v. State, 626 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Bair v. Bair (fladistctapp, 2017-03-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bair v. Bair
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Randolph v. Randolph, 626 So.2d 342, 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (noting that the value of a corporation is determined by both the value of all its assets and the amount of its liabilities and that it is error to exclude either one).
Emmet ROZIER
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 92-3134.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 19, 1993.
626 So. 2d 342
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Goshorn, Griffin, Peterson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the restitution ordered for expenses to cover the cost of the victim’s inpatient treatment. The restitution ordered for the travel expenses and lost wages of the mother of the victim are stricken, however. See Watson v. State, 579 So.2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA1991); Cliburn v. State, 510 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA1987). We also strike the “state attorney’s fee.” E.g., Turkaly v. State, 615 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA1993).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.