Superville v. State, 642 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Superville v. State, 642 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
James Francis SUPERVILLE
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 94-1228.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 29, 1994.
642 So. 2d 1193
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, David P. Gauldin, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Daniel A. David, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Allen, Kahn, Mickle.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
MICKLE, Judge.

The order of the trial court adjudging appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt is reversed upon the authority of Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162, 86 S.Ct. 352, 15 L.Ed.2d 240 (1965) and Pendley v. State, 392 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent -with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Upon remand, should appellant be convicted of indirect criminal contempt, the maximum penalty imposed without trial by jury shall not exceed six months’ imprisonment. Martinez v. State, 339 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), affirmed, 346 So.2d 68 (Fla.1977); Butler v. State, 330 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 863, 97 S.Ct. 168, 50 L.Ed.2d 142 (1976).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.