Tibero v. State, 646 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Tibero v. State, 646 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Williams v. State (fladistctapp, 1995-06-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · confidence medium
Goshay v. State, 646 So.2d 213, 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Department of Children & Families v. D.T.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Bruce v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Cox v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Ch. 95-189, § 1, Laws of Fla. AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED for Correction of Probation Order.
cited Cited "see" Allen v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Robinson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Braggs v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Smith v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Trumpole v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
cited Cited "see" Mosely v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Miller v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (on rehearing en banc).
cited Cited "see" Goodrich v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (era banc).
cited Cited "see" Nesbitt v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Fitzpatrick v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Marcov v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Webb v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Buchanan v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Fyler v. State, 645 So.2d 108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Drake v. State, 644 So.2d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Walker v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Roberts v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Brown v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Lowell v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Rose v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Williams v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Gordon v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
cited Cited "see" Brooks v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Craig v. State, 643 So.2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
cited Cited "see" Richardson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc).
Ronald TIBERO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
94-392.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 16, 1994.
646 So. 2d 213
Per Curiam.
Cited by 53 opinions  |  Published

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We granted the State's motion for rehearing in this cause and, because there is a recurring problem in the trial court's grant of costs in criminal cases, we elect to consider this case en banc. After considering the supplemental briefing and en banc oral argument, we conclude, as did the original panel, that the assessment by the trial court of a $48.00 deposit to First Step of Volusia County, Inc. is beyond the authority of the court.

We are unable to agree with the State that the court's inherent authority justifies this award. While we agree that the court has inherent authority to order those things "that are reasonably necessary for the administration of justice within the scope of its jurisdiction,"[1] the deposit to First Step simply does not meet this condition. The State presented no other authority for the assessment. The requirement for such deposit, therefore, is stricken from the conditions of probation.

In all other respects, the judgment and order of probation are affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH, COBB, W. SHARP, GOSHORN, PETERSON, GRIFFIN, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

1 Rose v. Palm Beach County, 361 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1978).