Jaramillo v. State, 659 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Jaramillo v. State, 659 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: N.H.M. v. State (fladistctapp, 2008-01-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) N.H.M. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) NHM v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Velasquez
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · confidence medium
In Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), which involved the same facts presented in Mr. Velasquez’s first appeal, we relied on Von Deck in explaining that, on remand, “[t]he state cannot retry Jaramillo for attempted first-degree murder; however, the state can file an amended information and proceed against Jaramillo for aggravated' assault with a firearm without violating double jeopardy.” Additionally, in Mr. Velasquez’s first appeal, we noted that he could not be retried for attempted first degree murder because he had been found not guilty of those charges, b…
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (holding that the State can file an amended information on remand after a judgment is reversed so long as the new charge does not violate the defendant’s double jeopardy rights).
cited Cited "see" Mauldin v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Velasquez.
cited Cited "see" Gaston v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
cited Cited "see" BSW v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Gay v. State, 432 So.2d 602, 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
cited Cited "see" B.S.W. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Gay v. State, 432 So.2d 602, 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carswell v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See Lane v. State, 861 So.2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). 4 “[D]ue process prohibits a defendant from being convicted of a crime not charged in the information or indictment.” Crain v. State, 894 So.2d 59, 69 (Fla.2004); see also N.H.M. v. State, 974 So.2d 484, 485-86 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (citing Jaramillo v. State, 659 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)).
Efram JARAMILLO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
93-03544.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 25, 1995.
659 So. 2d 1238
Parker.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published

[*1239] Elizabeth L. Hapner, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

Efram Jaramillo appeals his three convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm. Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After reviewing the record in accordance with our obligation under State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1987), we directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the issue of whether Jaramillo's convictions must be reversed because the charging document failed to allege all of the essential elements of aggravated assault with a firearm. The parties filed supplemental briefs, and the state conceded error.

The state filed an amended information charging Jaramillo with three counts of attempted first-degree murder. After a bench trial the court found Jaramillo guilty of three counts of aggravated assault with a firearm.

A conviction on a charge not contained in the charging document is a denial of due process. State v. Gray, 435 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1983). The information in this case did not allege the element that the victim had a well-founded fear of imminent violence. That element is essential to support a conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm. State v. Roberts, 616 So.2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Because the information failed to allege all of the essential elements of the crime for which he was convicted, Jaramillo's convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm must be reversed. See Velasquez v. State, 654 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The state cannot retry Jaramillo for attempted first-degree murder; however, the state can file an amended information and proceed against Jaramillo for aggravated assault with a firearm without violating double jeopardy. See Von Deck v. Evander, 622 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.