Espana v. Redneris, 661 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Espana v. Redneris, 661 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the general rule is that a defendant not requesting affirmative relief is not required to travel to the forum of the action for a discovery deposition absent extraordinary circumstances.”
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: CVS Caremark Corp. v. Latour (fladistctapp, 2013-03-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) CVS Caremark Corp. v. Latour
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the general rule is that a defendant not requesting affirmative relief is not required to travel to the forum of the action for a discovery deposition absent extraordinary circumstances.
cited Cited "see" Ayer v. Bush
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Espana v. Redneris, 661 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
Jesus Maria ESPANA
v.
Hilda REDNERIS
No. 95-1953.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov 1, 1995.
661 So. 2d 1295
Frances Fernandez Gausch of Sparkman, Robb, Nelson & Mason, Miami, for petitioner., Todd R. Falzone of Sheldon J. Sehlesinger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.
Klein, Polen, Warner.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court requiring the petitioner in a personal injury action to appear in Dade County for deposition or have his pleadings struck. The defendant is a resident of Guatemala and did not plead for affirmative relief in the proceedings below. There is no evidence in the record that he is evading discovery. The general rule is that a defendant not requesting affirmative relief is not required to travel to the forum of the action for a discovery deposition absent extraordinary circumstances. See, e.g., Patterson v. Venne, 594 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Godshall v. Hessen, 227 So.2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969), cert, denied, 237 So.2d 530 (Fla.1970). This case does not present extraordinary circumstances to deviate from the general rule.

The order requiring petitioner to appear for a discovery deposition in Dade County is quashed.

WARNER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.