JM Fam. Enter., Inc. v. Winter Park Imports, Inc., 67 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
JM Fam. Enter., Inc. v. Winter Park Imports, Inc., 67 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 7× by 7 distinct cases · "The element of lawful execution of a legal duty is satisfied if an officer has either a founded suspicion to stop the person or probable cause to make a warrantless arrest."
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fields v. Chatmon (flmd, 2025-08-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Fields v. Chatmon
M.D. Fla. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the element of lawful execution of a legal duty is satisfied if an officer has either a founded suspicion to stop the person or probable cause to make a warrantless arrest.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) TD v. State (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the element of lawful execution of a legal duty is satisfied if an officer has either a founded suspicion to stop the person or probable cause to make a warrantless arrest.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) T.D. v. State (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the element of lawful execution of a legal duty is satisfied if an officer has either a founded suspicion to stop the person or probable cause to make a warrant-less arrest.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) T.I.J., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
As we held in M.J. v. State, 67 So. 3d 1189, 1190-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011): The element of lawful execution of a legal duty is satisfied if an officer has either a founded suspicion to stop the person or probable cause to make a warrantless arrest.
cited Cited "see" P.B. v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See M.J. v. State, 67 So.3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); N.H. v. State, 890 So.2d 514, 516-17 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Jay v. State, 731 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
JM FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC.
v.
WINTER PARK IMPORTS, INC.
No. 5D10-4008.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 23, 2011.
67 So. 3d 1189
Dean Bunch, C. Everett Boyd, Jr. and J. Andrew Bertron, Jr., of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Tallahassee, and Daniel F. Katz and Julie Ann Lund of Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, pro hac vice, for Appellants., Ladd H. Fassett and Phil A. D’Aniello of Fassett, Anthony & Taylor, P.A., Orlando, and John W. Forehand of Kurkin, Forehand, Brandes, LLP, Tallahassee, for Ap-pellee.
Evander, Lawson, Torpy.
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: #28,354 of 633,719
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (2) · M.D. Florida (1)
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Winter Park Imports, Inc. v. JM Family Enters., 66 So.3d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.