Musso v. Musso, 670 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). · Go Syfert
Musso v. Musso, 670 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Salazar v. Giraldo (fladistctapp, 2016-05-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" Salazar v. Giraldo (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Musso v. Musso, 670 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (affirming the trial court’s order of partition because the 2 In her proposed counterpetition, Former Wife did not allege the parties’ places of residence.
Kathy MUSSO
v.
Ciro MUSSO
No. 95-0421.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 6, 1996.
670 So. 2d 122
Denise Apter and Stuart R. Manoff of Weissman & Manoff, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant., Darryl P. Figueroa of Renick, Singer & Kamber, Lake Worth, for appellee.
Glickstein, Klein, Warner.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects except for paragraph thirteen thereof. As to that paragraph, we remand for the trial court to consider, without any further hearing, whether the accounts are governed by section 710.112, Florida Statutes (1993). If so, said accounts are to be maintained as custodial accounts with a single custodian. If the court determines said accounts are not governed by said statute, it is to order that they be changed to those where two signatories are permitted. As to the partition, the appellant has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the amendment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(b). Nor has appellant established an abuse of discretion in the trial court’s support and property distribution award.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.