Philip Morris, Inc. v. Broin, 672 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Philip Morris, Inc. v. Broin, 672 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · …although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits.
31 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n (fladistctapp, 2002-08-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
generally, courts require more than a single instance of poor judgment to disqualify a claimant from unemployment compensation.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Cullen v. Neighborly Senior Services, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Losa v. Diana Foods Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Coffey v. Florida Foster Care Review Project Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Morales v. Florida Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
“Although an employee’s actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits.” Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) HIALEAH HOUSING AUTHORITY v. Garcia
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
See Johnson v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 884 So.2d 228, 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (confirming that misconduct under this provision is not mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, poor performance as a consequence of incapacity, inadvertence, good faith errors in judgment or discretion, or ordinary negligence in isolated instances and that misbehavior serious enough to warrant dismissal is not necessarily serious enough to sustain a forfeiture of unemployment benefits); Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (stating that "[a]lthough an employee's actions may …
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cruz v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
And, “ ‘[although an employee’s actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits.’ ” Vilar v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 889 So.2d 933, 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (quoting Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vilar v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
"Although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits." Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Anderson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
Spink v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 798 So.2d 899, 902 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citations omitted); Philemy v. Florida Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 731 So.2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Jackson v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 730 So.2d 719, 721 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) ("Misconduct usually consists of repeated instances in the face of warnings, and isolated acts of poor judgment do not amount to misconduct.”); Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ("Generally, courts require more than a single instance of poor judgment to disqualify a claimant from unemp…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Donnell v. University Community Hosp.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
"Although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits." Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Baptiste v. Waste Management, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
"Although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits." Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also Bulkan v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 648 So.2d 846, 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Easton v. STATE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
Penney Co., 689 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Howden v. Pronet, Inc., 688 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
cited Cited "see" Clark v. Professional Call Centers, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, 672 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
cited Cited "see" Philemy v. Florida Dept. of HRS
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
discussed Cited "see" Roberts v. Diehl
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Betancourt, 672 So.2d at 38 (although an employee's actions may justify discharge, the same conduct does not necessarily preclude entitlement to unemployment benefits).
cited Cited "see" Webb v. Rice
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
cited Cited "see" Grossman v. JC PENNEY CO. 2071
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Bulkan v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 648 So.2d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
cited Cited "see" Freddo v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, N.A., 672 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
cited Cited "see" Calvo v. Florida Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, 672 So.2d 37 , (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) and cases cited therein.
PHILIP MORRIS, INC., et al., Appellants,
v.
Norma R. BROIN, et al., Appellees.
95-86.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 3, 1996.
672 So. 2d 37
Gersten, Goderich and Green.
Published

Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, and Alan C. Sundberg, and Sylvia H. Walbolt, and F. Townsend Hawkes, Tallahassee; Dechert, Price & Rhodes, and Robert C. Hein for appellants.

Stanley M. Rosenblatt, and Susan Rosenblatt, for appellees.

Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Broin v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., 641 So.2d 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), rev. denied, 654 So.2d 919 (Fla.1995).