Smith v. State, 756 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. State, 756 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7791633.
Charles SMITH
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D99-2773.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 26, 2000.
756 So. 2d 238
Charles Smith, in proper person., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Gersten, Goderich, Shevin.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Defendant seeks reversal of an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief contending that the Gort Act violated the single-subject rule. We reverse. Defendant was sentenced pursuant to the Gort Act; he committed the offenses on July 12, 1996. The state properly concedes that defendant is entitled to be re-sentenced as the supreme court has held that the Gort Act as originally enacted is unconstitutional. See State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999); Lee v. State, 739 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand the cause for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.